Cuberite Forum

Full Version: Arguments against the name change.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
This is not a debate. Do not debate here, do not post counter-arguments, and generally do not post anything other than this:

List your arguments against changing to Cuberite the name, not necessarily to Cuberite..
Keep it short and to the point, preferably 1 argument per post / a bulleted list of arguments.

This is not about changing the organization name to Cuberite and retaining MCServer as the server name. It's about changing the whole thing.
NO DEBATING HERE.
[attachment=572]

Also, I don't like the name at all
The genericness of MCServer brings us some side traffic from people searching for other stuff.

Changing the name in the code base / documentation requires some effort.
I am all for a name change, but I don't agree with Cuberite.

It's mostly just personal preference, but it doesn't sound right to me. When I think of Cuberite, I don't think of Minecraft but of some new crappy rip-off. I feel like we need to delve into more name options then have a vote based on the available options and pick the winner, even if the winner is Cuberite.
Slightly change the OP, I clarified that you should list arguments against changing the name, not necessarily to Cuberite.

Sorry for invalidating your post Shadow,Toni.Tongue
Arguments... let's see.

> The project lead should be in favor of a name change.

> Discussions about it are to bringing smiles for everyone involved.

> Never change a running system.

> The current name has been used for a while.

> It's a hassle.

> The current name is straightforward.