Cuberite Forum

I would like to use this but i got this. Can you please update it

[19:45:04] cPluginManager.AddHook(): Deprecated format used, use cPluginManager.AddHook(HOOK_TYPE, CallbackFunction) instead. Fixing the call for you.
[19:45:04] Stack trace:
[19:45:04] [C](-1): AddHook
[19:45:04] Plugins/Afk/main.lua(22): (no name)
[19:45:04] Stack trace end
[19:45:04] cPluginManager.AddHook(): Deprecated format used, use cPluginManager.AddHook(HOOK_TYPE, CallbackFunction) instead. Fixing the call for you.
[19:45:04] Stack trace:
[19:45:04] [C](-1): AddHook
[19:45:04] Plugins/Afk/main.lua(23): (no name)
[19:45:04] Stack trace end
[19:45:04] cPluginManager.AddHook(): Deprecated format used, use cPluginManager.AddHook(HOOK_TYPE, CallbackFunction) instead. Fixing the call for you.
[19:45:04] Stack trace:
[19:45:04] [C](-1): AddHook
[19:45:04] Plugins/Afk/main.lua(24): (no name)
[19:45:04] Stack trace end
[19:45:04] cPluginManager.AddHook(): Deprecated format used, use cPluginManager.AddHook(HOOK_TYPE, CallbackFunction) instead. Fixing the call for you.
[19:45:04] Stack trace:
[19:45:04] [C](-1): AddHook
[19:45:04] Plugins/Afk/main.lua(25): (no name)
[19:45:04] Stack trace end
[19:45:04] cPluginManager.AddHook(): Deprecated format used, use cPluginManager.AddHook(HOOK_TYPE, CallbackFunction) instead. Fixing the call for you.
[19:45:04] Stack trace:
[19:45:04] [C](-1): AddHook
[19:45:04] Plugins/Afk/main.lua(26): (no name)
[19:45:04] Stack trace end

---

A Client-side player stays if someone turned to afk status.
if a player is afk while the server reloads, the player's name will be [AFK] Player

:O thats bad.

I don't recommend using this plugin. It's like my first plugin, and there are problems I can't fix even with a rewrite.

Alright, /afk is not that necessary. The signlock plugin will be much more needed.

Doesn't that work again?

Well as i said here, it doesnt: https://forum.cuberite.org/showthread.ph...2#pid12002
And you said you will propably rewrite it so i'm just going to wait

But I'm not going to if it isn't realy needed

But it is needed :/ everyone wants to protect their chest.

But it works fine for me, so I have no idea what I have to rewrite. (lets move this to the actual SignLock thread btw)

(02-02-2014, 05:00 AM)NiLSPACE Wrote: [ -> ]I don't recommend using this plugin. It's like my first plugin, and there are problems I can't fix even with a rewrite.

so this plugin is no good then? why not label it as abandoned or something?

Yeah, good idea. I'll do that.