+- Cuberite Forum (https://forum.cuberite.org)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-9.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topic Discussion (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Random Chitchat 2012-2016 (/thread-434.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
RE: What we're doing - FakeTruth - 06-04-2013
Well I did it.. phew..
RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 06-04-2013
(06-04-2013, 04:57 AM)tonibm19 Wrote: Are Enchantments done? Are all enchantments avaliable and saved?
Enchantments are now only available with plugins. You can't enchant using an enchantment table yet.
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 06-04-2013
That's it! I'm fed up with updating the API wiki. It's too much work, and it's never done. We need a better solution. I quite like doxygen, and already there are pieces of code well documented in doxygen-style, but it would be documentation for the entire project, not for the API itself. We need a filter, similar to what tolua++ does when it generates the bindings, but it needs to keep the doxycomments as well.
I think I have a new project
(06-04-2013, 05:46 AM)STR_Warrior Wrote:(06-04-2013, 04:57 AM)tonibm19 Wrote: Are Enchantments done? Are all enchantments avaliable and saved?
Enchantments are now only available with plugins. You can't enchant using an enchantment table yet.
Also, enchantments don't actually do anything. Unbreaking doesn't prolong the life of items, protection doesn't protect, etc.
RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 06-04-2013
(06-04-2013, 06:09 AM)xoft Wrote: Also, enchantments don't actually do anything. Unbreaking doesn't prolong the life of items, protection doesn't protect, etc.
Unbreaking etc could maybe even be done with a plugin
But it would be better to implent it into the source
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 06-04-2013
(06-04-2013, 06:09 AM)xoft Wrote: [...] We need a filter, similar to what tolua++ does when it generates the bindings, [...]
I first tried to see if doxygen could be used directly - run it for all files, but specify to exclude all symbols except for those listed in API.txt (or a similar file that could be generated by Lua). Unfortunately, this is not supported by doxygen - it can exclude specified symbols, but it cannot include specified symbols, so there's no way of telling it "give me documentation only for these symbols".
So I'm back to square one, I'll be writing a filter that processes the ToLua++ package file and produces a subset of the C++ code; then doxygen will process that file.
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 06-04-2013
I'm not sure if this is a good approach either. The documentation created by doxygen is too C++-centric, not sure if it's good enough for Lua API documentation. The syntax is C++, parameters are listed in a C++ manner and thus return values handled specially by tolua are lost.
See for yourself:
http://mc-server.xoft.cz/API/html/classes.html
On the other hand, I must hand it to doxygen, the inheritance is handled great - there are inheritance graphs, lists of inherited member functions... We're missing that in the wiki.
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 06-05-2013
I'm thinking about removing the cTorch, cStairs, cLadder, cVine and cDoor classes - they contain only methods that convert player rotation to block metadata, which should be handled by BlockHandlers instead. Anyone against?
RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 06-05-2013
Microsoft announced VS2013 ;O They say some old features will be added again since many people were complaining ;P
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 06-05-2013
We'll see. They seem to have added WinXP compilation support to VS2012, eventually, but I'm not sure if VS2012 itself would run on XP. With VS2013, the situation is probably gonna be the same.
The problem is, XP is still good enough so people don't want to upgrade - why, it's working fine, and the replacements aren't giving any major advantages
RE: What we're doing - FakeTruth - 06-05-2013
I never wanna go back to XP
