Cuberite Forum
Random Chitchat 2012-2016 - Printable Version

+- Cuberite Forum (https://forum.cuberite.org)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-9.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topic Discussion (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Random Chitchat 2012-2016 (/thread-434.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487


RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 09-07-2013

I first had the GTS 250, the that one broke so I used my brothers old GT 9600. I can now finaly play with Fancy graphics and far rendering without lagg again.

Windows index gives this GPU a 7.3. It gave the GTS 250 a 6.9 so this one is slightly better.


RE: What we're doing - ThuGie - 09-07-2013

Ah yeah so for you it would be a upgrade.
I had so much problems playing games i would get like bsod and crap.
Onboard video card, i was like going to buy new video card, but right now im tight on cash so i took a risk and flashed by bios.
So far no more problems but only did it yesterday and have only played minecraft.

Normaly only get it due skype or high end games so.. will have to wait otherwise i need to buy new video card Sad.
Thinking about a 2gb card though. might as well save up some more for new hdd as well. its seeing its end soonish.


RE: What we're doing - xoft - 09-08-2013

Wow, the Release 1.6 series finally allows us to drop the need for PrimaryVersion. Kinda.

The ServerlistPing packet is followed by a PluginMessage packet specifying the client version. However, because that packet wasn't there before, MCServer would need to wait for it with some kind of a timeout, producing a false ping delay in the older clients. WHY don't they send the protocol version BEFORE the ServerlistPing?

Ref.: http://wiki.vg/Server_List_Ping


RE: What we're doing - xoft - 09-09-2013

I think I've fixed a major issue with the client consuming too much RAM when connected to MCS. We didn't send any UnloadChunk packets for 1.3.2+ clients - because the protocol didn't have an UnloadChunk packet. What remained hidden was that chunks were unloaded using the regular ChunkData packet. I've implemented that now, so the clients should be much more manageable RAM-wise.


RE: What we're doing - tigerw - 09-15-2013

I like how the past fifteen commits have all been APIDump related.

Also, I think we have a major (but core dump-less) problem with one of the recent changes causing MCServer on Debian Wheezy to crash on client login.

FS #431. It may have been a change to the clang compiling thingy, but I will go through the builds to test.


RE: What we're doing - xoft - 09-15-2013

Yeah, APIDump is a big project now, and it is in a stage when it can already be used. In case you didn't try it, have a look at what it already does here: http://mc-server.xoft.cz/LuaAPI/
Yes, I know it looks ugly, but that's just a matter of proper CSS (anyone is welcome to contribute one); the main thing is that it has ALL the API functions exported by MCS, and it will automagically append descriptions to those functions that have been documented.

As for the crash - if it crashes in a debug build, then try following the crash reporting guide on the "Live analysis" paragraph. This should help us locate the bug.


RE: What we're doing - tigerw - 09-15-2013

Minecraft 1.7 and how it will affect MCS in a nutshell:

Distance to complete vanilla replication -= 250.

Seriously, read the change logs. The command blocks themselves are like, impossible. We need ten more xofts for a realistic possiblility of MCS becoming mainstreamTongue


RE: What we're doing - xoft - 09-15-2013

Well no wonder, they've got more than five people working on it full-time, we've got only a handful of volunteers working on MCS in our free time.


RE: What we're doing - tigerw - 09-15-2013

(09-15-2013, 06:09 PM)xoft Wrote: Well no wonder, they've got more than five people working on it full-time, we've got only a handful of volunteers working on MCS in our free time.

That sums up the situation very well. Speaking of volunteers, FakeTruth should do stuff again!


RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 09-15-2013

Well FakeTruth made MCServer open source becouse he didn't have the time to work on MCServer anymore, so it makes sense that he doesn't do allot.