New minecraft version. (1.15) - Printable Version +- Cuberite Forum (https://forum.cuberite.org) +-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-9.html) +--- Forum: Off Topic Discussion (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: New minecraft version. (1.15) (/thread-422.html) |
RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - NiLSPACE - 03-01-2016 Since the changes are so big compared to 1.8 I think we should consider removing 1.7 and 1.8 support. RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - tigerw - 03-01-2016 hear hear RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - tigerw - 03-01-2016 wow, all the packet IDs changed. RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - LO1ZB - 03-01-2016 (03-01-2016, 08:59 AM)tigerw Wrote: wow, all the packet IDs changed. RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - PureTryOut - 03-01-2016 Spigot is updated already. Do they work together with Mojang or something? How can they do it so quick, while Cuberite still even has to start updating? RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - NiLSPACE - 03-01-2016 Because they use Mojang code and have allot more contributors. RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - Schwertspize - 03-02-2016 And because they didnt do everything in that few hours. they update their code almost every time when a new developer build is out there so they only have to fix a few stuff after release... (probably we could do that too, someday, but especially now they have to focus on other stuff) RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - PureTryOut - 03-02-2016 I realize it is not done in a few hours Is the reason they are using Mojang's code, the reason they use that BuildTools.jar to distribute? I guess that makes it proprietary? Great... If only Cuberite had all of the plugins I need RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - Schwertspize - 03-02-2016 they use buildtools not to get problems with mojang.... specifically, you may not destribute modified code i think but they only distribute tools of how to modify the code yourself.... RE: New minecraft version. (1.9.0) - Jammet - 03-02-2016 Code: [18:57:00] Client "::ffff:88.152.249.103" uses an unsupported protocol (lengthed, version 107 (0x6b)) Is this related? |