+- Cuberite Forum (https://forum.cuberite.org)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-9.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topic Discussion (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Random Chitchat 2012-2016 (/thread-434.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
RE: What we're doing - DiamondToaster - 03-29-2015
It also binds pretty tightly to C++, so it should be easy to implement and the lack of a large scripting overhead goes quite nicely with MCServer's lightweight and fast nature.
What could also be done is that AngelScript plugins have a .as/.asc extension. Maybe that could be used if this is ever done to detect the type of plugin?
RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 03-29-2015
It might be smart to create a new thread to discuss this
RE: What we're doing - DiamondToaster - 03-29-2015
I'll do that, since it's probably spamming this thread.
RE: What we're doing - tonibm19 - 03-30-2015
After some months, I recompiled and retried MCS again, and a crazy idea has come into my mind: Why not remove mobs?
I know it's quite bad idea, but mobs currently do nothing, eat cpu and thats all, and maybe cause deadlocks. That also would maybe force an AI rewrite and get rid of mob bugs cause MCS wouldn't oficially support them.
Just writting down this here, it has just been a sort of lightning into my mind.
RE: What we're doing - DiamondToaster - 03-30-2015
I actually find mobs useful for testing my PvP plugins.
They actually know when to attack and I can use that to test OnTakeDamage hooks and stuff.
RE: What we're doing - worktycho - 03-31-2015
@xoft What would you think about using the SmallVector from http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/SmallVector_8h_source.html . Its licensed under the University of Illinois Open Source License, which according to https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a is compalable with apache?
RE: What we're doing - DiamondToaster - 03-31-2015
For some strange reason, I wanted to look at the CraftBukkit source code...It's so icky...variables named j, k, l...
RE: What we're doing - Seadragon91 - 03-31-2015
(03-31-2015, 05:11 AM)DiamondToaster Wrote: For some strange reason, I wanted to look at the CraftBukkit source code...It's so icky...variables named j, k, l...
Well, because the code from mojang is obfuscated, that's why the source code looks that ugly.
RE: What we're doing - DiamondToaster - 03-31-2015
But, most of the code is clearly readable? Most of the variables have proper names though.
http://code.openhub.net/file?fid=YkSVHXg9QZHKCBpg3SjMos9Ulb8&cid=PvtaSe5_8Yo&s=&fp=1774&projSelected=true#L0
I'm probably wrong though, I don't know too much about Java.
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 03-31-2015
@worktycho what exactly would you use it for? What are the advantages?
@DiamondToaster the good names are provided by the decompiling team manually - they go through the source and guess what's what, then they write rules for the deobfuscator - "class aa should be renamed to Block, variable var1 should be renamed to maxX, function func_3358 should be renamed to getStepSound" etc. That's why mods take such a long time - when a new minecraft version comes out, first the MCP team has to update these mapping tables for the new binary, then the mod author needs to update their code for the changes in the engine (and recompile against a newer decompiled minecraft)