Cuberite Forum
Random Chitchat 2012-2016 - Printable Version

+- Cuberite Forum (https://forum.cuberite.org)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-9.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topic Discussion (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Random Chitchat 2012-2016 (/thread-434.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487

RE: What we're doing - bearbin - 08-28-2013

Here's mine.

Code:
traceroute to mc-server.org (46.21.172.157), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1  192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1)  6.241 ms  6.235 ms  6.397 ms
2  host-92-16-62-1.as13285.net (92.16.62.1)  38.699 ms  42.956 ms  46.260 ms
3  host-78-151-225-189.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.189)  52.009 ms  52.010 ms  55.476 ms
4  host-78-151-225-156.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.156)  58.783 ms host-78-151-225-196.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.196)  62.786 ms host-78-151-225-232.static.as13285.net (78.151.225.232)  62.782 ms
5  host-78-144-11-105.as13285.net (78.144.11.105)  66.595 ms host-78-144-11-93.as13285.net (78.144.11.93)  70.587 ms host-78-144-11-95.as13285.net (78.144.11.95)  73.291 ms
6  host-78-144-10-157.as13285.net (78.144.10.157)  76.113 ms host-78-144-10-73.as13285.net (78.144.10.73)  42.235 ms host-78-144-10-75.as13285.net (78.144.10.75)  44.735 ms
7  ve1010.r1.lon2.uk.atrato.net (80.94.66.13)  45.875 ms  50.423 ms  50.419 ms
8  eth1-1.core1.lon2.uk.atrato.net (78.152.44.92)  52.097 ms  55.455 ms  55.451 ms
9  eth4-6.core1.ams1.nl.atrato.net (78.152.44.78)  63.211 ms  68.308 ms  73.179 ms
10  eth1-5.edge1.ams5.nl.atrato.net (78.152.34.30)  73.170 ms  94.106 ms  94.107 ms
11  eth2-4.edge1.rtd1.nl.atrato.net (78.152.44.32)  100.670 ms  100.682 ms  52.335 ms
12  rijndata-42755-gw.ztm1.nl.as5580.net (78.152.32.182)  52.329 ms  51.590 ms  51.587 ms
13  rtr01.zmr001.dict.nl (46.21.175.34)  430.057 ms  430.072 ms  434.299 ms
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *


RE: What we're doing - xoft - 08-28-2013

I guess you already have a few, but here's one more Smile
Code:
1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  3    16 ms    10 ms    10 ms  ip-86-49-0-217.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.0.217]
  4    11 ms    12 ms    12 ms  84.116.222.198
  5    10 ms    12 ms    24 ms  84.116.222.193
  6    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  84.116.222.189
  7    12 ms     9 ms    12 ms  84.116.222.185
  8    10 ms    19 ms    34 ms  213.46.180.10
  9    28 ms    24 ms    24 ms  eth2-7.r1.fra1.de.atrato.net [78.152.44.14]
10    40 ms    47 ms    38 ms  eth10-5.core1.ams2.nl.atrato.net [80.94.64.221]
11    44 ms    44 ms   210 ms  eth2-5.edge1.ams5.nl.atrato.net [78.152.44.133]
12    42 ms    36 ms    45 ms  eth2-4.edge1.rtd1.nl.atrato.net [78.152.44.32]
13    35 ms    38 ms    37 ms  rijndata-42755-gw.ztm1.nl.as5580.net [78.152.32.182]
14    38 ms    41 ms    38 ms  rtr01.zmr001.dict.nl [46.21.175.34]
15    43 ms    38 ms    38 ms  46.21.172.157
Here's a wireshark capture of the forum mainpage reload; upon first glance I find it odd that the first connection attempt just times out after 3 seconds and only then the connections get served.

RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 08-28-2013

Here is mine:
Code:
1    <1 ms   <1 ms   <1 ms  192.168.1.1
2    <1 ms   <1 ms   <1 ms  188-142-48-1.FTTH.ispfabriek.nl [188.142.48.1]
3     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms  188.142.0.38
4     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms  188.142.0.37
5     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms  188.142.0.134
6     2 ms    12 ms     2 ms  openpeering.nikhef.nl-ix.net [193.239.116.17]
7     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  openpeering.rijndata.nl [82.150.158.251]
8     4 ms     4 ms     4 ms  rtr01.zmr001.dict.nl [46.21.175.34]
9     4 ms     3 ms     3 ms  vserver3.axc.nl [46.21.172.157]


RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 08-29-2013

You can compile Lua :O I didn't know that Wink But now i'm curious if it also runs on other platforms then Windows. I compiled something I was working on. Its a custom .Ini file reader. It only has 3 functions GetValue, SetValue(Bugged) ForEachValueInKey() but whatever Smile Just install this like a normal plugin in MCServer.

RE: What we're doing - FakeTruth - 08-29-2013

I think it depends on the machine's endianness and if it's 32 or 64 bit that decides whether the compiled Lua script runs on another machine. If these things are the same, it should run no problem.

RE: What we're doing - xoft - 08-29-2013

Not only can you compile Lua, you can also JIT it. And we might be able to do that in MCS as well, should the need arise. So far I don't think we'd have to do that, the plugins we do are quite simple and don't bottleneck the performance.
Ref.: http://luajit.org/

RE: What we're doing - bearbin - 08-29-2013

Yeah, luajit seems a good idea, but I'm not sure if it adds any overhead for simple plugins like we have ATM. It might be harder to integrate, too.

RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 08-29-2013

If you compiled Lua and let MCServer execute it, would it be faster then when you would not compile it?

RE: What we're doing - bearbin - 08-29-2013

IDK. LuaJIT is very fast, and normal lua is extremely fast for an interpreted language anyway.

RE: What we're doing - xoft - 08-29-2013

(08-29-2013, 04:14 AM)STR_Warrior Wrote: If you compiled Lua and let MCServer execute it, would it be faster then when you would not compile it?

I don't think so, if I remember correctly, Lua compiles all the code thrown at it before executing it, so the only thing that would be faster would be plugin load time. And that is already pretty fast. And anyway, as I said, the plugins are not the bottleneck now, by far not, so there's no point in optimizing that.