12-23-2013, 06:44 AM
(12-23-2013, 06:18 AM)xoft Wrote: I believe #1 affects the source code - the code should contain a statement of copyright.Ah that's the part some libraries have in the top of each file. MCServer doesn't have that in all files so it doesn't even conform to it's own license (LOL)!
(12-23-2013, 06:18 AM)xoft Wrote: #2 affects the binary distribution, and usually is done by having all the licenses for the components inside the distributed package. #3 is mixed, both source code and binary distribution should have at least a notice along the lines of "uses code derived from MCServer".
I also believe that as long as you don't do anything really bad, you can "bend" the interpretation of the rules a bit as you need. After all, the only people who could actually send lawyers on you are the people developing MCServer, so it all boils down to how much you trust this community. Me personally, I consider all my contributions public domain, so do whatever you want with them
Alright, thanks. I don't really want to spend a lot of time on licenses so I'll just do what I think is fair
include license and notify that the code is modified...