03-02-2015, 05:45 PM
Because that's what FakeTruth chose when he put a license on the project, if I remember right.
Source-less MIT license?
|
03-02-2015, 05:45 PM
Because that's what FakeTruth chose when he put a license on the project, if I remember right.
Thanks given by: PCPlayerLV
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Source-less MIT license? - by xoft - 03-01-2015, 04:59 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by NiLSPACE - 03-01-2015, 05:05 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by DiamondToaster - 03-01-2015, 05:08 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by xoft - 03-01-2015, 05:36 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by worktycho - 03-01-2015, 10:29 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by bearbin - 03-01-2015, 10:24 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by sphinxc0re - 03-01-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by bearbin - 03-02-2015, 05:45 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by sphinxc0re - 03-02-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by FakeTruth - 03-03-2015, 03:24 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by bearbin - 03-03-2015, 05:34 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by FakeTruth - 03-03-2015, 08:33 AM
|