What about bugfixes? If we just merge from master for them we get everything, and I do not have confidence in our ability to produce a master that is capable of promotion to stable without changes.
Or do you mean that we merge to master then cherry-pick to testing, because that has the same end result and just gives us problems when we want to merge in master.
Also things should only be marked as important if they are in testing. Thinking about it, perhaps a better name would be release-blocking.
Or do you mean that we merge to master then cherry-pick to testing, because that has the same end result and just gives us problems when we want to merge in master.
Also things should only be marked as important if they are in testing. Thinking about it, perhaps a better name would be release-blocking.