Better way to create a "soft depend"?
#5
I like the "not all plugins are loaded" case because it gives me some future-proofing (and also the ability to bugtest using unload/load in addition to reload).

And yes, I had exactly that system in place. I created a "registerPlaceholder" function and a "callPlaceholder" function (not those exact names).

I think that, unless I find a significant problem with my method, I'll keep going with it. It's not easier, it produces more errors than IRChat's method of hooking into Core (although significantly fewer than Xoft's), but it's "safer".
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: Better way to create a "soft depend"? - by Zee1234 - 12-11-2015, 07:23 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)