Cuberite Forum › Cuberite › Development
More strict PR-handling proposal

Poll: Do you want a more strict PR policy
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
83.33%
 5 83.33%
No
16.67%
 1 16.67%
Total 6 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Linear Mode
More strict PR-handling proposal
LogicParrot Offline
Cuberite Developer
******
Posts: 721
Threads: 77
Joined: Apr 2014
Thanks: 0
Given 9 thank(s) in 90 post(s)
#8
02-26-2017, 05:43 AM
I don't mind this anymore. As long as no useful code is lost do whatever you want.
If a closed abandoned PR has useful code, I think marking it with "status/extract useful bits" is a good idea.
Find
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
More strict PR-handling proposal - by sphinxc0re - 02-25-2017, 06:32 AM
RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by xoft - 02-25-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by yangm97 - 02-26-2017, 03:06 AM
RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by LogicParrot - 02-26-2017, 05:43 AM
RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by xoft - 02-26-2017, 06:31 AM
RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by xoft - 03-03-2017, 08:03 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)