| Poll: Which option would be best for autogenerating code? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| A perl script commited to the repositry | 0 | 0% | |
| A python script commited to the repositry | 3 | 100.00% | |
| A one off script in either language not in the repository | 0 | 0% | |
| a C++ program that could be commited to the repository. | 0 | 0% | |
| other | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 3 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code.
|
01-12-2014, 02:00 AM
I'm just going through the cPluginManager::Call* methods to add locks and it seems to me that it would be far easier to autogenerate the methods from a list of Hooks. However that is somewhat beyond to c++ preprocessor. At the moment we have no dependent programs capable of generating the code and it seems slightly over the top to write a program in c++ to generate these methods. So how do you feel about adding a perl or python script to generate the methods?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by worktycho - 01-12-2014, 02:00 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by NiLSPACE - 01-12-2014, 02:11 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by worktycho - 01-12-2014, 02:15 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by xoft - 01-12-2014, 02:22 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by worktycho - 01-12-2014, 02:55 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by xoft - 01-12-2014, 03:03 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by worktycho - 01-12-2014, 04:16 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by xoft - 01-12-2014, 04:58 AM
RE: python or perl as additional dependecy for generating code. - by worktycho - 01-12-2014, 05:29 AM
|
