Proposed Message Standardisation
#4
Ah. The problem with colouring the whole chat: vanilla was white for a reason - the text was easily distinguishable whatever your background. Colouring just the prefix, and not the text, solves that whilst still distinguishing between chat and errors.

Besides, a multi-coloured chat full of hard-to-read messages (say, green against forest, or red against wool) is less clear than a colour coded tagging system, don't you think?

Personally, I think the caps are quite neat, but that's just my opinion.
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 08-08-2013, 02:45 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 08-08-2013, 02:47 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 08-08-2013, 03:11 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 08-08-2013, 03:22 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 08-08-2013, 06:36 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 08-08-2013, 06:47 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 08-08-2013, 06:52 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-06-2014, 09:06 PM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-07-2014, 04:33 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 02-07-2014, 05:30 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-07-2014, 07:24 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-07-2014, 07:56 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-07-2014, 08:44 PM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-08-2014, 12:27 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-08-2014, 04:14 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 02-08-2014, 04:40 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-08-2014, 07:10 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-08-2014, 08:04 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-08-2014, 08:37 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-09-2014, 07:09 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)