Proposed Message Standardisation
#6
(08-08-2013, 03:16 AM)STR_Warrior Wrote:
(08-08-2013, 03:11 AM)tigerw Wrote: vanilla was white for a reason

The chats background is dark for a reason. Wink

tigerw Wrote:green against forest, or red against wool

I tried it and I can read it perfectly.

Okay, what about condensing the prefixes? Say, to three letters? Minimum intrusion?

Okay, it's readable, but in my opinion, harder to do so. I can certainly speak for myself here, and the transparency of the chat doesn't help that much.
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 08-08-2013, 02:45 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 08-08-2013, 02:47 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 08-08-2013, 03:11 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 08-08-2013, 03:22 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 08-08-2013, 06:36 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 08-08-2013, 06:47 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 08-08-2013, 06:52 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-06-2014, 09:06 PM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-07-2014, 04:33 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 02-07-2014, 05:30 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-07-2014, 07:24 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-07-2014, 07:56 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-07-2014, 08:44 PM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-08-2014, 12:27 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-08-2014, 04:14 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by bearbin - 02-08-2014, 04:40 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-08-2014, 07:10 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-08-2014, 08:04 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by xoft - 02-08-2014, 08:37 AM
RE: Proposed Message Standardisation - by tigerw - 02-09-2014, 07:09 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)