Source-less MIT license?
#5
Well, it would be legal for someone to redistribute the binary without the source so why not distribute it without the source? This is why the GPL is so complicated, avoiding loopholes like this.
Reply
Thanks given by: PCPlayerLV


Messages In This Thread
Source-less MIT license? - by xoft - 03-01-2015, 04:59 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by NiLSPACE - 03-01-2015, 05:05 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by DiamondToaster - 03-01-2015, 05:08 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by xoft - 03-01-2015, 05:36 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by worktycho - 03-01-2015, 10:29 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by bearbin - 03-01-2015, 10:24 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by sphinxc0re - 03-01-2015, 10:30 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by bearbin - 03-02-2015, 05:45 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by sphinxc0re - 03-02-2015, 07:42 PM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by FakeTruth - 03-03-2015, 03:24 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by bearbin - 03-03-2015, 05:34 AM
RE: Source-less MIT license? - by FakeTruth - 03-03-2015, 08:33 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)