Spreading too thin
#3
I think someone said Cuberite developers had their own personal to-do lists. What about turning them into GitHub Projects? Also, adding priority tags to issues could do something. Setting priorities would be nice too. Do we all agree Cuberite needs to be feature complete asap or should we instead focus on things Cuberite would do better? Like that Lobby API for minigames. I myself use both Cuberite and Spigot on my server, it’s not unthinkable other people would do that too, thanks to bungeecord. EDIT: Cuberite can already be a god damn good lobby and login server! Only missing bits IMO are:
- Login plugin that stores data on MySQL with bungeecord and spigot support (maybe creating a AuthMe drop in replacement would work);
- Good Looking Portal plugin that teleports to other bungeecord servers.

xoft is right about the project needing more developers though. I know I can (and have done) a Dockerfile for Cuberite. I know I can (and am going to) make another webadmin interface for Cuberite. I report things I, as an end user, think are issues. Still, none of that would make Cuberite more feature complete against vanilla, but that’s what I know how to do. 

On an unrelated note, I've chosen to learn programming in C++ so that maybe someday I could help Cuberite Tongue
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Spreading too thin - by LogicParrot - 01-14-2017, 11:58 PM
RE: Spreading too thin - by xoft - 01-15-2017, 07:37 AM
RE: Spreading too thin - by yangm97 - 01-15-2017, 11:21 AM
RE: Spreading too thin - by sphinxc0re - 01-16-2017, 02:20 AM
RE: Spreading too thin - by LogicParrot - 01-16-2017, 03:39 AM
RE: Spreading too thin - by omboner44 - 07-22-2017, 02:32 AM
RE: Spreading too thin - by tigerw - 07-22-2017, 07:26 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)