Posts: 954
	Threads: 16
	Joined: May 2013
	
Thanks: 68
	Given 112 thank(s) in 93 post(s)
	 
	
	
		It's not meant to be human-readable, is it?
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 783
	Threads: 12
	Joined: Jan 2014
	
Thanks: 2
	Given 75 thank(s) in 62 post(s)
	 
	
		
		
		01-15-2014, 04:27 AM 
(This post was last modified: 01-15-2014, 04:40 AM by worktycho.)
		
	 
	
		No, you need kcachegrind
Looks like Compression is one of the biggest single things in these profiles. It might be worth tuning the compression value a little.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 954
	Threads: 16
	Joined: May 2013
	
Thanks: 68
	Given 112 thank(s) in 93 post(s)
	 
	
	
		Okay, thanks.
How does the redstone simulator perform, could I ask?
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 783
	Threads: 12
	Joined: Jan 2014
	
Thanks: 2
	Given 75 thank(s) in 62 post(s)
	 
	
	
		@tiger. The readstone simulator isn't coming up on the traces much so its very fast when not being used.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 954
	Threads: 16
	Joined: May 2013
	
Thanks: 68
	Given 112 thank(s) in 93 post(s)
	 
	
	
		Thanks xoft and tycho.
I'll have a look at profiling on windows soon.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 6,482
	Threads: 176
	Joined: Jan 2012
	
Thanks: 131
	Given 1085 thank(s) in 857 post(s)
	 
	
	
		Currently the biggest CPU eater for me is the mob processing - it allocates and deallocates several structures for all mobs every tick; the allocations are killing everything.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 783
	Threads: 12
	Joined: Jan 2014
	
Thanks: 2
	Given 75 thank(s) in 62 post(s)
	 
	
	
		For me mobs are using about a third of cpu but there spread over a lot of functions so its hard to find somewhere worth optimising. For me the big cpu killer is compression, consistently using a third of cpu regardless of load. It might be worth tuning the compression parameters or looking at why so many chunks are being saved.