The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Trying to access array offset on null - Line: 198 - File: inc/plugins/google_seo.php PHP 8.3.36 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/inc/plugins/google_seo.php 198 errorHandler->error_callback
/inc/plugins/google_seo/redirect.php 131 google_seo_tid
/inc/class_plugins.php 142 google_seo_redirect_hook
/global.php 100 pluginSystem->run_hooks
/showthread.php 28 require_once
Warning [2] Undefined property: DB_MySQLi::$google_seo_query_limit - Line: 232 - File: inc/plugins/google_seo.php PHP 8.3.36 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/inc/plugins/google_seo.php 232 errorHandler->error_callback
/inc/plugins/google_seo/redirect.php 131 google_seo_tid
/inc/class_plugins.php 142 google_seo_redirect_hook
/global.php 100 pluginSystem->run_hooks
/showthread.php 28 require_once
Warning [2] Decrement on type null has no effect, this will change in the next major version of PHP - Line: 232 - File: inc/plugins/google_seo.php PHP 8.3.36 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/inc/plugins/google_seo.php 232 errorHandler->error_callback
/inc/plugins/google_seo/redirect.php 131 google_seo_tid
/inc/class_plugins.php 142 google_seo_redirect_hook
/global.php 100 pluginSystem->run_hooks
/showthread.php 28 require_once



Cuberite Forum › Cuberite › Discussion
Should we switch to the container based infrastructure of Travis?

Threaded Mode
Should we switch to the container based infrastructure of Travis?
sphinxc0re Offline
Cuberite Developer
******
Posts: 681
Threads: 26
Joined: May 2014
Thanks: 112
Given 54 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
#1
07-14-2015, 03:18 AM (This post was last modified: 07-16-2015, 02:29 AM by sphinxc0re.)
Travis has a new infrastructure where new builds start after 10sec.
http://docs.travis-ci.com/user/migrating-from-legacy/
Find
Reply
Thanks given by:
xoft Offline
Cuberite Developer
******
Posts: 6,481
Threads: 176
Joined: Jan 2012
Thanks: 131
Given 1099 thank(s) in 859 post(s)
#2
07-15-2015, 06:34 PM
That would be great, but last time we checked there was a version-related problem, they didn't have a new-enough gcc for us.
Find
Reply
Thanks given by:




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)