More strict PR-handling proposal

Poll: Do you want a more strict PR policy You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes	83.33%	5	83.33%
No	16.67%	1	16.67%
Total		6 vote(s)	100%

* You voted for this item.

[Show Results]

Linear Mode

More strict PR-handling proposal

LogicParrot Offline

Cuberite Developer

Posts: 721
Threads: 77
Joined: Apr 2014

Thanks: 113
Given 130 thank(s) in 91 post(s)

02-26-2017, 05:43 AM

I don't mind this anymore. As long as no useful code is lost do whatever you want.
If a closed abandoned PR has useful code, I think marking it with "status/extract useful bits" is a good idea.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

More strict PR-handling proposal - by sphinxc0re - 02-25-2017, 06:32 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by xoft - 02-25-2017, 09:50 PM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by sphinxc0re - 02-25-2017, 11:40 PM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by yangm97 - 02-26-2017, 03:06 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by LogicParrot - 02-26-2017, 03:12 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by NiLSPACE - 02-26-2017, 04:02 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by sphinxc0re - 02-26-2017, 04:03 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by LogicParrot - 02-26-2017, 05:43 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by xoft - 02-26-2017, 06:31 AM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by LogicParrot - 03-03-2017, 07:06 PM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by xoft - 03-03-2017, 08:03 PM

RE: More strict PR-handling proposal - by LogicParrot - 03-03-2017, 09:05 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)