+- Cuberite Forum (https://forum.cuberite.org)
+-- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-9.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topic Discussion (https://forum.cuberite.org/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Random Chitchat 2012-2016 (/thread-434.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
RE: What we're doing - tigerw - 01-12-2016
(01-12-2016, 06:54 AM)DiamondToaster Wrote:(01-12-2016, 06:12 AM)tonibm19 Wrote: For a plugin I use the AddSpeedY() function and it works (player gets up like a rocket as I want) but then the speed is the same. If a mob hits the player he's punched up a lot, just like if I run my command which uses AddSpeedY().
Any way to make it work like gravity so when the player returns on the ground it gets to normal speed? Or do i need an sheduletask or something like that to return speed back to normal.
I get the same problem with some of my plugins. I just assumed that it was due to my crappy coding.
Generalised comment: the physics system is not great at present.
(01-12-2016, 06:43 AM)DiamondToaster Wrote: Wow. Java 9 Snapshot, I'm impressed. Hitting 1000+ FPS vanilla.
Damn. They're closing the interpreted/compiled performance gap fast.
xoft, ESET writes better software, right? https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=693
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 01-12-2016
Yeah, our software is a bit better, although we did have some of those google-security-research incidents, too. Not that ridiculous, though.
I don't think it's the interpreted/compiled gap, it must be new optimizations to the display routines. It also depends very much on the world and direction you're looking. On my old laptop I get like 10 times slowdown when looking forward, compared to looking straight down. And I once wrote a world generator in Cuberite that brought any client to its knees, because the world was unoptimizable.
RE: What we're doing - DiamondToaster - 01-13-2016
Any client? Challenge accepted!
Something worse than the Far Lands would be interesting to see.
RE: What we're doing - Schwertspize - 01-13-2016
@xoft do you know the ~date? AFAIK git has a history and we could download old versions in Vanilla client...
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 01-13-2016
The code didn't make it to the repo, quite understandably. It was when I was testing out various terrain height generators and had them output some test values into the world. I managed to make a more-or-less "50% gray" - every other block was set to stone, the rest was air. There were so many polygons that the client cannot fit them into the available memory, let alone render. I suppose modern client could have some optimizations to prevent a crash in this situation, thanks to occlusion culling; for such a case, a similar pattern, but less dense, should still do the trick.
It should be rather easy to write such a generator as a plugin, if you really want to test that.
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 01-13-2016
Something similar to SethBling's SkyGrid map, just a bit denser.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dhs3ithXDA
RE: What we're doing - NiLSPACE - 01-14-2016
Looks like Microsoft just put their Javascript engine online: https://github.com/Microsoft/Chakracore
RE: What we're doing - MCFreak999 - 01-14-2016
(01-13-2016, 06:33 AM)DiamondToaster Wrote: Any client? Challenge accepted!
I thought the farlands were pretty kewl, in 1.7 beta. But anyways, your opinion
RE: What we're doing - xoft - 01-16-2016
Sister is getting married tomorrow, the frenetic chaos levels are rising...
RE: What we're doing - Schwertspize - 01-16-2016
Yesterday, first time ever, I got compilation issues and it seems to be gcc itself. I'm on Ubuntu and using gcc-5.1 (after trying 4.9)
On another machine it compiles just normal