04-30-2013, 02:51 PM 
		
	
	
		Another possibility would be to write our own SSL / TLS support using CryptoPP. It feels like reinventing the wheel, but on the other hand, it could lead to a nice new minimalistic SSL / TLS library. And If I wrote it, I'd put it into public domain, to match CryptoPP's license. That'd be a first  Not sure how difficult the thing would be, though, and how little a subset of TLS we could afford to support.
 Not sure how difficult the thing would be, though, and how little a subset of TLS we could afford to support.
And of course there's a possibility of changing MCServer's license to be compatible with other libraries - CyaSSL for example requires a GPLv2-compatible license, and I like it can cooperate with CryptoPP, we wouldn't have two separate crypto engines nor would we have to change MCS to another one.
	
	
	
	
 Not sure how difficult the thing would be, though, and how little a subset of TLS we could afford to support.
 Not sure how difficult the thing would be, though, and how little a subset of TLS we could afford to support.And of course there's a possibility of changing MCServer's license to be compatible with other libraries - CyaSSL for example requires a GPLv2-compatible license, and I like it can cooperate with CryptoPP, we wouldn't have two separate crypto engines nor would we have to change MCS to another one.

 

 
