IF GitHub supports the mode that multiple developers can take care of a single (upstream) repo, then I guess I'll be alright with the move. Depends on FakeTruth now. We could, of course, move without him, but it would be impolite in the very least
He's the original author, after all.
Also, the commits in the SVN reference FlySpray issues, so it would be a good idea to keep the FlySpray alive, even if read-only. Or at least mirror its data somewhere read-only, so that the issues can be found by their IDs.
Oh, and I'd need somebody to help me fix the windows nightbuild scripts and, while at it, find a way to include the commit ID in the source so that it can be logged, that'd be great.
He's the original author, after all.Also, the commits in the SVN reference FlySpray issues, so it would be a good idea to keep the FlySpray alive, even if read-only. Or at least mirror its data somewhere read-only, so that the issues can be found by their IDs.
Oh, and I'd need somebody to help me fix the windows nightbuild scripts and, while at it, find a way to include the commit ID in the source so that it can be logged, that'd be great.