Posts: 4,634
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2011
Thanks: 695
Given 495 thank(s) in 424 post(s)
You can still use TortoiseSVN to commit changes to the source. Also you can just checkout the source. The only problem I have is that loading the github website takes longer than the google code website on slow(mobile) devices.
Posts: 1,469
Threads: 57
Joined: Jul 2012
Thanks: 66
Given 127 thank(s) in 108 post(s)
I believe github has a feature where you can set an alias for your account to solve the problem of it not knowing who you are.
The SVN changes can be ported across still, although not the other way around.
I'll get started on a guide for working with git. I think the best way for the workflow to work for us is for everyone to commit to the master repo, but NOT to teh master branch, instead to their branch or a feature branch, then submit a PR back to master and merge it in.
Posts: 6,485
Threads: 176
Joined: Jan 2012
Thanks: 131
Given 1075 thank(s) in 852 post(s)
I guess the move is official now, we're on GitHub now, so it's time to update all the links to the source and the bugtracker - in the wiki, in the forum redirect sections...
Is there any way to make the googlecode repo and FlySpray read-only?
Posts: 1,450
Threads: 53
Joined: Feb 2011
Thanks: 15
Given 120 thank(s) in 91 post(s)
I cannot make the googlecode repository read-online, but I can remove all members to make sure nobody can make a change.
I will then also update the main page with a notice and a link to the GitHub repository
Posts: 1,469
Threads: 57
Joined: Jul 2012
Thanks: 66
Given 127 thank(s) in 108 post(s)
I'm going to start work on transferring the wiki over, if it turns out good we'll have to see about that too.
It may not turn out to be as good, but we'll have to see.
Posts: 4,634
Threads: 115
Joined: Dec 2011
Thanks: 695
Given 495 thank(s) in 424 post(s)
I think we can better keep the wiki that we have now.
Posts: 6,485
Threads: 176
Joined: Jan 2012
Thanks: 131
Given 1075 thank(s) in 852 post(s)
Agree, keep the current wiki