Dropping the GitHub wiki

[NiLSPACE]

Nah, it's not as powerful as a wiki. Also, the book has everything in a single page which would be very unorganized when we get more content.

[sphinxc0re]

But the book does have a TOC

[NiLSPACE]

Yes, but that doesn't make it organized. Lets say we finally document the world.ini file in there. (you can find an outdated version here). The TOC would get so incredibly big that the TOC itself would become unclear. You'd get

• world.ini
  
  • [Plants] section
    
  • [Generator] section
    
    • Biome generators
      Height generators
      Terrain composition generators
      Finishers
      Fine-tuning
      
  • Examples:
    
    • Nether
      End
      Overworld
      Superflat
      
  • Physics
    
    • WaterSimulator
      LavaSimulator
      DeepSnow
      ...
      
    ...
    

and so on.

[sphinxc0re]

Make sections droppable ... like a spoiler on the forums

[Mathias]

Make sections droppable ... like a spoiler on the forums

Actually, now that I think about it, I like the idea of keeping the user manual and dropping the wiki. The user manual is easier to maintain, better structured.

[tigerw]

On the other hand, I am supportive of the GitHub wiki.

[Schwertspize]

I would prefer github wiki. we don't have to maintain it, we can concentrate on the content.

- I plan to contribute to the wiki