I suspect that attribution in a license file accompanying the app would be more than enough. As for the WTFPL, no one really knows if it would stand up in court, so if you were going to have an open license, its probably better to go for CC0.
(06-07-2015, 05:04 AM)worktycho Wrote: [ -> ] I suspect that attribution in a license file accompanying the app would be more than enough. As for the WTFPL, no one really knows if it would stand up in court, so if you were going to have an open license, its probably better to go for CC0.
The logo is also used on all websites, documentation and will also be used in other places where attribution is infeasible.
I agree with your suggestion about licensing of logos - for a logo to be accepted the creator should license it CC0. WTFPL is identical to public domain, except less explicit, so it shares any problems there may be with public domain licensing.
(06-07-2015, 04:44 AM)DiamondToaster Wrote: [ -> ]EDIT: License change.
I'll release it under CC0.
16x16
32x32
128x128
256x256
It is a bit meh, I probably overdid the "single-tone" color thing and cartoon stuff a bit too much.
I personally think this logo reminds too much of SurvivalCraft's logo.
![[Image: icon.png]](https://kaalus.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/icon.png)
https://kaalus.wordpress.com/
I agree with NiLSPACE, the current logo the forum uses looks great.
Yeah, I never noticed that. I also think that the current logo would be best.
Yep, that logo is way too similar to the SurvivalCraft one. Does anybody else have suggestions for logos?
(06-08-2015, 10:04 PM)bearbin Wrote: [ -> ]Yep, that logo is way too similar to the SurvivalCraft one. Does anybody else have suggestions for logos?
I just made another one. Of course it can be changed, improved, etc. Though I like the colors.
I like the idea behind that logo. With improvement, it could be good.
Can you be more specific? What do you have in mind?
I love the idea too, but are you sure it isn't used elsewhere ? I'm not a fan of the flashy yellow background.