01-29-2014, 11:39 PM
That makes sense, I finally understood 
And it could be actually done without creating new subcommands - for example the del subcommand could be issued by either the protectors or the admins, but if someone was deleting an area that they didn't own, an extra permission would be checked. So the permission protection.del.own would enable to delete own areas, and protection.del.any would enable to delete any area, both with the same command. Is that reasonable?
And it could be actually done without creating new subcommands - for example the del subcommand could be issued by either the protectors or the admins, but if someone was deleting an area that they didn't own, an extra permission would be checked. So the permission protection.del.own would enable to delete own areas, and protection.del.any would enable to delete any area, both with the same command. Is that reasonable?