Single block data storage
#9
Hey,
thanks for the patch, l0udPL.

But I think we have to work on the Entity system. It´s very ugly that we have to hardcode every entity in that many places. (For full compatibility we need to add much more entities)

Wouldn´t it be much cleaner to somehow merge cBlockEntity and cBlockEntityHandler?

The only problem would be the storage at the runtime. (Although it is no problem to create multiple instances of a blockhandler)
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-11-2012, 08:24 PM
RE: Single block data storage - by xoft - 08-11-2012, 08:57 PM
RE: Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-13-2012, 04:59 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by NiLSPACE - 08-13-2012, 05:00 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-13-2012, 05:14 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by NiLSPACE - 08-14-2012, 12:36 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-27-2012, 03:16 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by xoft - 08-27-2012, 03:53 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by Lapayo - 08-29-2012, 03:38 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-29-2012, 04:04 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by xoft - 08-29-2012, 04:35 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-29-2012, 04:48 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by xoft - 08-29-2012, 04:55 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by l0udPL - 08-29-2012, 07:20 AM
RE: Single block data storage - by xoft - 08-29-2012, 08:02 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)