Hanfer,
thanks for the effort. I integrated the patch as rev 997, although I think it could use some refinement - some of the items have their own separate itemhandlers, so it would make sense to put the stack count there, instead of the generic case. Because if later someone is searching for the stack counts for a specific item, they won't be looking in the generic class, but in the specific descendants.
Also, you're using tabs in your patch to align things into columns. That's not a good idea, because anyone can have any tab size, therefore breaking the columns. Use tab for indentation and spaces for alignment into columns.
thanks for the effort. I integrated the patch as rev 997, although I think it could use some refinement - some of the items have their own separate itemhandlers, so it would make sense to put the stack count there, instead of the generic case. Because if later someone is searching for the stack counts for a specific item, they won't be looking in the generic class, but in the specific descendants.
Also, you're using tabs in your patch to align things into columns. That's not a good idea, because anyone can have any tab size, therefore breaking the columns. Use tab for indentation and spaces for alignment into columns.